data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb6c2/fb6c22636d5f7e53d5765693324c726b07cfc105" alt=""
These vocal cords belong to a middle-aged chronic smoker who has suffered from a hoarse voice for close to a year. His wife has been my patient for many years and she decided to bring him to see me. As you can see there is intense leukoplakia on both vocal cords. A CT scan revealed no framework infiltration or extension into the pre-epiglottic space. I had tried several biopsies using a flexible scope but tissue was inadequate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dceee/dceee5b76a60de6d3cdbed13f17bfceed3f9ff13" alt=""
I put him under for a proper microflap excision today. Seen here is the epithelium and subepithelial layers raised, revealing the vocal ligament and gelatinous lamina propria covering it. One advantage of doing this is that I can directly inspect for deep infiltration and also examine the ventricle and subglottic space (which were free growth).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa96f/aa96f3c71dab218aa16ad96ee9ef87fb1c63c826" alt=""
As the free edge of the vocal cord was not spared by this exophytic lesion, it didn't seem logical to confine my excision to the dorsal surface only. After all, voice-sparing was no longer my concern. More important was to get a good representative specimen. The dilemma/temptation was to get some tissue from the opposite vocal cord but thankfully caution prevailed. Last thing I need is an adhesion anteriorly and ruin his voice forever.
Should the lesion be non-invasive, I can still go in again to do the other side. If it's malignant then some radical modality will be offered. That's the plan.